What connects the named brands Checked

Documented link
FatPirate, Gransino and CasinoLab each link Uno Affiliates from their own websites; AskGamblers’ programme listing names all three.
Legal operator
FatPirate’s terms define “Company” as the website operator without giving that company’s name.
Reader consequence
The marketing link does not decide whether a login, account restriction or welcome-offer history is shared.

FatPirate’s sister sites comparison

FatPirate, Gransino and CasinoLab publish closely similar four-deposit casino welcome packages. The casinos’ promotion pages, including FatPirate’s first-deposit offer, give a first-deposit bonus and a €20 qualifying deposit. The documented business link between the brands is their shared Uno Affiliates marketing programme; the available customer terms do not identify one legal gambling operator for all three. The table compares three published offers. It cannot establish a common customer account or licence.

Published welcome packages at the three Uno Affiliates brands
Casino Published first-deposit bonus Minimum deposit evidenced

FatPirate

100% up to €2,500 plus 100 free spins; part of a four-deposit package. €20 to qualify for the published welcome bonus.

Gransino

100% up to €2,500 plus 100 free spins; part of a four-deposit package. €20 to qualify for the published welcome bonus.

CasinoLab

100% up to €2,500 plus 100 free spins; part of a four-deposit package. €20 to qualify for the published welcome bonus.

Sources: FatPirate, Gransino and CasinoLab welcome-package rules. Checked 8 October 2026. The €20 is a promotion threshold, not a verified cashier-wide floor.

The three first-deposit promotions currently print the same headline rate, cap, spin count and €20 entry condition. They also attach wagering and activation rules, so the headline is not a cash return. Each offer in the table comes from that casino’s own promotion page, rather than a copied network list. It has a clear boundary, too: a matching promotion can come from a shared marketing arrangement or common software without proving a common gambling operator. A FatPirate account should not be assumed to qualify or disqualify a customer at Gransino or CasinoLab solely because the three offers look alike.

Gransino and CasinoLab are the most useful names to examine first. The FatPirate, Gransino and CasinoLab homepages each carry a partner link to Uno Affiliates. AskGamblers' Uno Affiliates profile independently lists all three as casino brands in that programme. A reader can therefore trace a real connection without depending on a page that merely says the sites look alike.

The same AskGamblers roster also names Casea and Lizaro. Those names belong in the wider affiliate-programme picture, although the first-party footer comparison made here is strongest for Gransino and CasinoLab. A programme can market several casinos operated under different customer contracts. We cannot turn every name in its roster into a legal sister site without an operator statement for each one.

Named casino connections, with the evidence kept in its proper role
Casino Published connection to FatPirate What remains to be established

Gransino

Its homepage and FatPirate’s homepage link the same affiliate programme; AskGamblers lists both. A named legal gambling operator on current customer documents for both brands.

CasinoLab

Its homepage and FatPirate’s homepage link the same affiliate programme; AskGamblers lists both. The same operator match; similar wording in their terms is not that match.

Casea and Lizaro

Both appear in AskGamblers’ wider Uno Affiliates roster. Each brand’s current operating company and its relationship to FatPirate.

The name on a homepage is also worth checking carefully. FatPirate has a casino, live casino and sportsbook on the same branded service. Those sections are not three sister casinos. The archival homepage view below shows one FatPirate address with several navigation areas, not separate brands or account agreements.

Archival FatPirate desktop homepage with the casino, live casino and sports links in one navigation
Archival FatPirate desktop homepage image published by Tribuna; capture date is not established. It illustrates the brand and navigation, not today’s promotion or legal operator. See FatPirate’s own homepage.

FatPirate's sister sites certificates compared

FatPirate, Gransino and CasinoLab have a documented Uno Affiliates marketing link. The available official records do not place all three casino domains under one licensee. Their individual terms, starting with FatPirate’s customer rules, therefore carry the licence statements that can be compared here.

What each casino’s published terms establish about licensing
Casino Current official-site material reviewed Licence comparison

FatPirate

Its general terms define the “Company” by role without naming the legal entity in that definition. No named licensee and licence number in the cited clause to match to another brand.

Gransino

Its general terms govern the separately named Gransino website. A shared affiliate partner is not a licence entry for FatPirate.

CasinoLab

Its general terms govern the separately named CasinoLab website. Similar contract structure does not identify one common licence holder.

Sources: the casinos’ own FatPirate, Gransino and CasinoLab terms, plus the Gambling Commission business register for any GB claim. Checked 8 October 2026.

The current sources do not supply three licence numbers that could be ranked or a regulator record placing all three domains under one licensee. That is the relevant difference from a verified same-operator network. The FatPirate terms name the brand and define an operator role without giving the company name in that definition; the other brands publish their own customer agreements. We therefore keep the relationship description to the documented affiliate programme and compare the offers at each site separately. A UK reader should not treat a foreign offer page or shared marketing link as evidence of permission to serve Great Britain; the exact domain and legal company need a British register match for that claim.

How far does the shared affiliate programme go?

Uno Affiliates says it supplies marketing materials and commissions for its casino and sports-betting brands. Its public website describes that relationship from an affiliate's point of view. Partner links on FatPirate, Gransino and CasinoLab document their use of the same marketing programme. They leave the customer-contract question unanswered: the company paying for referrals need not be the company that accepts a bet or owes a withdrawal.

This is why Gransino and CasinoLab can be discussed here without asserting an operator identity that the legal pages do not supply. The relationship is specific and sourced: three named sites point to the same affiliate programme. The legal conclusion is narrower. Our same-operator evidence standard requires the gambling company to be named for FatPirate and for the proposed sister brand. A common advertising partner cannot substitute for those names.

The CasinoLab terms, version 1.12 dated 19 August 2026, use much of the same account-language structure as FatPirate's version 1.13 dated 20 August 2026. Both define “Company” by its role on the website rather than naming a registered company in that definition. That similarity is consistent with shared documentation or a shared service model. It does not tell us which legal entity contracts with either customer. A supplier can provide the same template to separately operated sites.

Who operates FatPirate according to its current terms?

FatPirate's general terms, version 1.13, were marked updated on 20 August 2026. Clause 1.4 says references to “Company” mean the company operating the website, but does not give a legal name. The privacy notice likewise calls the website operator the data controller without naming it in the “Who We Are” passage. The site's footer shows the FatPirate brand and its affiliate partner, not a company registration that settles the operating role.

Why the available source types answer different questions
Source Useful finding Limit for a sister-site claim
FatPirate customer terms Current rules for the named website and the role called “Company”. The legal company is not named in the reviewed definition.
FatPirate privacy notice Mentions other brands within the same entity or operator as possible data recipients. It supplies no list of those brands or their account terms.
Uno Affiliates roster Names FatPirate, Gransino, CasinoLab, Casea and Lizaro in one marketing programme. A programme roster is not a gambling licence or common-operator register.
Casino review directories Offer operator names that a reader may encounter in search. The named companies disagree and require a primary-document match.

The general verification blog explains how to compare exact domains and legal roles when both companies are named. In FatPirate's case, the first part of that comparison stops at an unnamed company. Repeating a popular operator label from a directory would make the page look more certain, but it would not settle a customer's contract.

Do accounts or restrictions carry between the named casinos?

No shared sign-in or wallet can be established from the Uno Affiliates link. FatPirate's account clause 3.2 limits duplicate accounts on its website by person, household, contact details and IP address. It says what FatPirate may do with another account on that service. It does not say a Gransino or CasinoLab account uses the same credentials or balance.

FatPirate's privacy notice allows disclosure of data to brands within the same entity or operator among other recipient categories. That wording is a permission and description of potential recipients. It does not identify which brand actually receives a particular customer's information, nor whether any two casinos recognise the same account. The answer for a real account must come from the applicable terms or a written response naming the services involved.

The UK support page offers independent help without requiring an ownership answer first. For a restriction at FatPirate, ask each service directly to confirm the accounts and dates covered; a request there cannot be assumed to close a Gransino or CasinoLab account. Clause 3.8 of FatPirate's terms tells customers to contact support for self-exclusion and disclose other accounts they may hold with the company, but names neither the company nor those other brands.

The second archival homepage view shows FatPirate's mobile casino, live-casino and sports navigation. The branded interface explains why the name is recognisable across its own service, but it cannot reveal account sharing with another company. The promotional wording in the image is historical and should not be used to assess a current offer.

Archival FatPirate mobile homepage with casino, live casino and sports tabs above game listings
Archival FatPirate mobile homepage image published by Chipy; capture date is not established. The visible tabs are parts of FatPirate’s own service. See the operator’s current homepage.

Would an earlier FatPirate account affect a welcome offer elsewhere?

Neither a fresh offer nor an exclusion from one follows automatically from this marketing link. FatPirate's general bonus clauses set one-per-person and household limits for its own promotions, and say a specific promotion's conditions take precedence where they differ. Its promotions page describes the casino welcome offer as a one-off for qualifying first deposits. Those statements govern an offer made by FatPirate. They do not write the promotion rules for CasinoLab or Gransino.

For a second brand, the decisive wording is the exact offer shown at that brand when the customer applies. Look for a clause that names prior customers, associated brands, the same person or household, and any group-wide exclusion. Then read the incorporated general terms. A paragraph about an affiliate programme cannot add a restriction that the offer does not state, and it cannot promise eligibility that the offer withholds. Our welcome-offer eligibility blog explains that comparison in detail.

For a disputed welcome offer, the useful record is the promotion visible when the customer applied and the general terms it incorporated. The archival homepage images here do not establish the offer in force now. If a current offer is refused because of an earlier casino account, save the promotion, applicable terms and the operator's explanation before drawing a conclusion about shared customer history.

What should a reader in Great Britain check?

The connection between these brands does not create permission to serve Great Britain. The Gambling Commission's business register allows a claimed British licence to be checked by legal business, trading name or exact domain. FatPirate's reviewed terms do not supply a legal operator name or GB licence number that can be matched to such a record. The affiliate relationship therefore cannot establish a GB licence for FatPirate, Gransino or CasinoLab.

The Gambling Commission explains that an overseas licence does not authorise an operator to provide gambling services to consumers in Great Britain. Some directories assign FatPirate a foreign company or licensing jurisdiction, while other directories disagree. A reader should first establish the exact fatpirate.com service and named company, then check any claimed permission against the relevant regulator's own record. The same exercise would be required independently for Gransino or CasinoLab; an affiliate link cannot transfer a licence from one brand to another.

This page is an account of the public relationship evidence, not a recommendation to open an account. If the immediate concern is an existing balance or a restriction, the appropriate next step is to preserve the FatPirate terms applying to that account and contact the service handling it. The sister-site label is less useful than a documented answer from the responsible company in that situation.

Where should an existing FatPirate complaint go?

FatPirate's complaints procedure in clause 13 starts with the support address printed there. Its help centre also directs customers to a formal complaint route. After an initial response, it gives a separate complaints address for a detailed written dispute. The terms ask for the account username, registered name and email, a clear account of the complaint, and relevant dates and times. They state an outcome within ten days after the required information is received, with an extension possible for a complex case. Use the addresses on the live terms page so a copied address does not become stale.

The important point for a sister-site question is the destination. A complaint about a FatPirate transaction belongs to the service that holds that account, even if another casino appears in the same affiliate roster. Sending it to Gransino, CasinoLab or Uno Affiliates because their names appear together could miss FatPirate's stated process. If the dispute concerns whether a restriction or earlier account is recognised elsewhere, ask each affected casino to identify the legal company responsible and put the answer in writing.

The sources cited here were checked on 30 September 2026. A new operator statement naming both FatPirate and another casino would change the sister-site conclusion; a revised promotional clause could change the offer analysis without changing ownership. Keeping those questions separate makes the answer useful even while different directories continue to publish different lists.

Sources used for this comparison